Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc., Toys "R" Us, Inc. And K-Mart Corporation

130 F.3d 1101, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 33867, 1997 WL 740783

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
• Decided: December 2, 1997
• Docket: 864, Docket 97-7545
• Status: Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Anti-Monopoly, Inc., appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Lawrence M. McKenna, Judge, dismissing its antitrust complaint against defendant Hasbro, Inc. The district court granted judgment on the pleadings dismissing so much of the complaint as asserted a secondary-line violation of the Robinson-Pat-man Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13, on the ground that plaintiff lacked standing to assert such claims. The court granted summary judgment dismissing the remainder of the complaint, which principally asserted- claims under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, and sections 3 and 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 14, 18, on the grounds, inter alia, that plaintiff failed to present evidence sufficient to permit a rational factfinder to infer that plaintiff suffered “antitrust injury.”

We have considered all of plaintiffs challenges to the district court’s rulings and have found in them no basis for reversal. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated in Judge McKenna’s Memorandum and Order, reported at 958 F.Supp. 895 (1997).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.