FEDERAL · 15 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Discrimination in price, services, or facilities

15 U.S.C. § 13
Title15Commerce and Trade
Chapter1 — MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE

This text of 15 U.S.C. § 13 (Discrimination in price, services, or facilities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
15 U.S.C. § 13.

Text

(a)Price; selection of customers It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchases involved in such discrimination are in commerce, where such commodities are sold for use, consumption, or resale within the United States or any Territory thereof or the District of Columbia or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and where the effect of such discrimination may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly re

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coastal Fuels of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Caribbean Petroleum Corp.
79 F.3d 182 (First Circuit, 1996)
130 case citations
Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco GMC, Inc.
546 U.S. 164 (Supreme Court, 2006)
87 case citations
Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc.
688 F.2d 328 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
67 case citations
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Billing
551 U.S. 264 (Supreme Court, 2007)
36 case citations
American Can Co. v. Russellville Canning Co.
191 F.2d 38 (Eighth Circuit, 1951)
36 case citations
Star Fuel Marts, LLC v. Sam's East, Inc.
362 F.3d 639 (Tenth Circuit, 2004)
19 case citations
United States v. Federal Communications Commission
652 F.2d 72 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
8 case citations
Chroma Lighting v. GTE Products Corp.
111 F.3d 653 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
7 case citations
Orologio of Short Hills Inc. v. Swatch Group (U.S.) Inc.
653 F. App'x 134 (Third Circuit, 2016)
4 case citations
The Borden Company v. Federal Trade Commission
339 F.2d 133 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)
4 case citations
Avon Pub. Co. v. American News Co.
122 F. Supp. 660 (S.D. New York, 1954)
4 case citations
Lafayette Steel Co. v. National Steel Corp.
87 F.R.D. 612 (E.D. Michigan, 1980)
2 case citations
Dovberg v. Dow Chemical Company
353 F.2d 963 (Third Circuit, 1965)
Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. J. R. Simplot Company
418 F.2d 793 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
Dagher v. Saudi Refining Inc., Sri)
369 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Rodriguez v. Diaz
(D. Arizona, 2024)

Source Credit

History

(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §2, 38 Stat. 730; June 19, 1936, ch. 592, §1, 49 Stat. 1526.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1936—Act June 19, 1936, amended section generally.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Short Title
Act June 19, 1936, which amended this section and added sections 13a, 13b, and 21a of this title, is popularly known as the Robinson-Patman Act, as the Robinson-Patman Antidiscrimination Act, and also as the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 U.S.C. § 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/15/13.