Daniel v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 17, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-11028·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMECHIDANIEL SSS Plaintiff, 20 CIVIL 11028 (PAE) -against- JUDGMENT CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated December 16, 2021, the Court grants the City's motion to dismiss the SAC's federal claims. That dismissal is with prejudice, as the SAC was Daniel's third complaint, and he has not identified any factual basis on which these claims may be rehabilitated. See Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdictional over Daniel's NYSHRL and NYCHRL claims. These claims are dismissed without prejudice; accordingly, this case is closed.

Dated: New York, New York December 17, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Cosy BY: D nc) 7 _ mg Cerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel v. City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Daniel v. City of New York (Daniel v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuoco v. Moritsugu
222 F.3d 99 (Second Circuit, 2000)