Nebraska Statutes
§ 27-1101 — Rule 1101. Applicability of rules; courts; proceedings generally; rules inapplicable; grand jury, miscellaneous proceedings; rules applicable in part
Nebraska § 27-1101
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 27Courts; Rules of Evidence
This text of Nebraska § 27-1101 (Rule 1101. Applicability of rules; courts; proceedings generally; rules inapplicable; grand jury, miscellaneous proceedings; rules applicable in part) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-1101 (2026).
Text
(1)The Nebraska Evidence Rules apply to the following courts in the State of Nebraska: Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, district courts, county courts, and juvenile courts. The word judge when used in the rules shall mean any judge of any court to which the rules apply or other officer who is authorized by statute to hold any hearing to which the rules apply.
(2)The rules apply generally to all civil and criminal proceedings, including contempt proceedings except those in which the judge may act summarily.
(3)The rules with respect to privileges apply at all stages of all actions, cases, and proceedings.
(4)The rules, other than those with respect to privileges, do not apply in the following situations:
(a)Proceedings before grand juries;
(b)Proceedings for extradition or rendition;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Interest of JS
417 N.W.2d 147 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Anderson
305 Neb. 978 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
State v. Jackson
408 N.W.2d 720 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
Hunt v. Roth
648 F.2d 1148 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
State v. Schmidt
562 N.W.2d 859 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)
Harpham v. General Casualty Co.
441 N.W.2d 600 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
JOYCE S. v. Frank S.
571 N.W.2d 801 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)
State v. Barker
420 N.W.2d 695 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Rush
317 Neb. 622 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
State v. Dillon
382 N.W.2d 353 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
Sherard v. Bethphage Mission, Inc.
464 N.W.2d 343 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
Sheridan v. Catering Management, Inc.
566 N.W.2d 110 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1997)
Dailey v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
578 N.W.2d 869 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1998)
Phillips v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.
558 N.W.2d 799 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1997)
State v. Hernandez
511 N.W.2d 535 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1993)
State v. Boswell
316 Neb. 542 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
K N Energy, Inc. v. Cities of Broken Bow
505 N.W.2d 102 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
Kimball v. NEB. DEPT. OF MOTOR VEHICLES
586 N.W.2d 439 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. Oliveira-Coutinho
304 Neb. 147 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)
State v. Wilson
556 N.W.2d 643 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1996)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1975, LB 279, § 72; Laws 1984, LB 13, § 46; Laws 1991, LB 732, § 70; Laws 2016, LB1094, § 1.
Cross References: Administrative Procedure Act, see section 84-920.
Annotations: 1. Proceedings exempt from rules 2. Miscellaneous 1. Proceedings exempt from rules A section 27-404 hearing is a preliminary determination for purposes of subsection (4)(b) of this section, exempting it from the evidence rules. State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622, 11 N.W.3d 394 (2024). In a criminal case, the Nebraska rules of evidence do not apply to suppression hearings. State v. Piper, 289 Neb. 364, 855 N.W.2d 1 (2014). Preliminary examinations or hearings in criminal cases are exempt from application of the evidence rules under subsection (4)(b) of this section. State v. Peterson, 280 Neb. 641, 788 N.W.2d 560 (2010). The Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court is not bound by the usual common-law or statutory rules of evidence. Sheridan v. Catering Mgmt., Inc., 252 Neb. 825, 566 N.W.2d 110 (1997). Nebraska Evidence Rules do not apply in juvenile court dispositional hearings such as one to terminate parental rights. The requirements of due process control a proceeding to terminate parental rights and the type of evidence which may be used by the State in an attempt to prove that parental rights should be terminated. In re Interest of P.D., 231 Neb. 608, 437 N.W.2d 156 (1989). The Nebraska Evidence Rules do not apply at a sentencing hearing. An affidavit may be used for purposes of sentencing if it is relevant to the sentence to be imposed. State v. Dillon, 222 Neb. 131, 382 N.W.2d 353 (1986). Nebraska Evidence Rules do not apply to proceedings for the granting or revoking of probation. State v. Ozmun, 221 Neb. 481, 378 N.W.2d 170 (1985). Statutory rules of evidence do not apply to, among other things, proceedings for extradition. In re Application of Mahan for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 211 Neb. 671, 319 N.W.2d 760 (1982). The statutory rules of evidence, except those governing privilege, do not apply to proceedings for extradition. Dovel v. Adams, 207 Neb. 766, 301 N.W.2d 102 (1981). The Board of Nursing is not bound by the law of evidence unless a party so requests. Scott v. State ex rel. Board of Nursing, 196 Neb. 681, 244 N.W.2d 683 (1976). 2. Miscellaneous A suppression hearing is a preliminary hearing within the meaning of subdivision (4)(b) of this section. State v. Piper, 289 Neb. 364, 855 N.W.2d 1 (2014). The Nebraska Evidence Rules, sections 27-101 to 27-1103, do not apply in juvenile court dispositional hearings, such as one to terminate parental rights; however, they do provide guidance in determining the type of evidence which meets due process requirements. In re Interest of D.L.S., 230 Neb. 435, 432 N.W.2d 31 (1988).
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 27-1101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/27-1101.