Nebraska Statutes
§ 27-101 — Rule 101. Scope
Nebraska § 27-101
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 27Courts; Rules of Evidence
This text of Nebraska § 27-101 (Rule 101. Scope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-101 (2026).
Text
These rules govern proceedings in the courts of the State of Nebraska, except to the extent and with the exceptions stated in section 27-1101 .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Interest of JS
417 N.W.2d 147 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
In Re Interest of JLM
451 N.W.2d 377 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
In Re Interest of LD
398 N.W.2d 91 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
In Re Interest of OLD
499 N.W.2d 552 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1993)
In Re Interest of DLS
432 N.W.2d 31 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
In Re Interest of JH
497 N.W.2d 346 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1993)
In Re Interest of MLS
452 N.W.2d 39 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
Thynne v. City of Omaha
351 N.W.2d 54 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
Jaeger v. Jaeger
307 Neb. 910 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2020)
In Re Interest of Adams
430 N.W.2d 295 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
In Re Interest of PD
437 N.W.2d 156 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Hopkins
377 N.W.2d 110 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. K.M.
451 N.W.2d 377 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
State v. Bunner
453 N.W.2d 97 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)
Dawson v. Papio Natural Resources District
292 N.W.2d 42 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1980)
In Re Interest of Daniel W.
529 N.W.2d 548 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1995)
State v. Clark
598 N.W.2d 765 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1999)
State v. Munn
322 N.W.2d 429 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1982)
Paw K. v. Christian G.
315 Neb. 781 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
Dugan v. Jensen
428 N.W.2d 504 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1975, LB 279, § 1.
Annotations: The rules of evidence apply to an affidavit offered during a hearing on a motion to vacate. Paw K. v. Christian G., 315 Neb. 781, 1 N.W.3d 467 (2024). In proceedings where the Nebraska Evidence Rules apply, the admissibility of evidence is controlled by the Nebraska Evidence Rules; judicial discretion is involved only when the rules make discretion a factor in determining admissibility. State v. Draganescu, 276 Neb. 448, 755 N.W.2d 57 (2008). When a state evidence rule is substantially similar to a corresponding federal rule of evidence, state courts may look to federal decisions interpreting the corresponding federal rule for guidance in construing the state rule. State v. Draganescu, 276 Neb. 448, 755 N.W.2d 57 (2008). Where the Nebraska Evidence Rules commit the evidentiary question at issue to the discretion of the trial court, an appellate court reviews the admissibility of evidence for an abuse of discretion. State v. Draganescu, 276 Neb. 448, 755 N.W.2d 57 (2008). At a juvenile adjudication hearing, the admissibility of evidence is governed by the customary rules of evidence used in trials without a jury. The Nebraska Evidence Rules do not apply at a dispositional hearing. The requirements of due process control a dispositional hearing and the type of evidence which may be used by the State. In re Interest of O.L.D. and M.D.D., 1 Neb. App. 471, 499 N.W.2d 552 (1993).
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 27-101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/27-101.