Nebraska Statutes
§ 27-1002 — Rule 1002. Requirement of original; exception
Nebraska § 27-1002
JurisdictionNebraska
Ch. 27Courts; Rules of Evidence
This text of Nebraska § 27-1002 (Rule 1002. Requirement of original; exception) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-1002 (2026).
Text
To prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or photograph is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules or by Act of Congress or of the Legislature of the State of Nebraska or by other rules adopted by the Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Decker
622 N.W.2d 903 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2001)
State v. Kula
616 N.W.2d 313 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2000)
State v. Mabior
994 N.W.2d 65 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2023)
Hoelck v. ICI Americas, Inc.
584 N.W.2d 52 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1998)
State v. Jensen
472 N.W.2d 423 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1991)
Gallner v. Larson
291 Neb. 205 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
In Re Complaint Against Jones
581 N.W.2d 876 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
132 Ventures v. Active Spine Physical Therapy
318 Neb. 64 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2024)
Omaha World-Herald Co. v. Nielsen
369 N.W.2d 631 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Richter v. City of Omaha
729 N.W.2d 67 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Mohr
632 N.W.2d 382 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2001)
Chevalier v. Metropolitan Util. Dist.
24 Neb. Ct. App. 874 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2017)
State ex rel. Commission on Judicial Qualifications v. Jones
581 N.W.2d 876 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. Frederiksen
400 N.W.2d 225 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1987)
Flodman v. Robinson
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2015)
Ganzel v. Ganzel
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2017)
Hart v. Bernhagen
(Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2022)
State v. Savage
301 Neb. 873 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2018)
Legislative History
Source: Laws 1975, LB 279, § 65.
Annotations: This section is a rule of preference for the production of the original of a writing, recording, or photograph when the contents of the item are sought to be proved. Richter v. City of Omaha, 273 Neb. 281, 729 N.W.2d 67 (2007). This "original writings" rule, which is sometimes inaccurately referred to as the "best evidence" rule, applies only if the party offering the evidence is seeking to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph. State v. Decker, 261 Neb. 382, 622 N.W.2d 903 (2001). The best evidence rule, which might more properly be called the "original writing" rule or, more correctly, the rule for "production of an original writing or document", is in reality a rule of preference for the production of the original of a writing, recording, or photograph when the contents of the item are sought to be proved. The original writing or "original document" rule does not set up a hierarchy for admissibility of evidence, but applies when a party seeks to prove material contents of a writing, recording, or photograph. The purpose of this section is the prevention of fraud, inaccuracy, mistake, or mistransmission of critical facts contained in a writing, recording, or photograph when its contents are an issue in a proceeding. By its terms, this section applies to proof of the contents of a recording. State v. Kula, 260 Neb. 183, 616 N.W.2d 313 (2000). The original document rule does not set up a hierarchy for admissibility of evidence, but applies when a party seeks to prove material contents of a writing, recording, or photograph. The purpose of this section is the prevention of fraud, inaccuracy, mistake, or mistransmission of critical facts contained in a writing, recording, or photograph when its contents are at issue in a proceeding. Equitable Life v. Starr, 241 Neb. 609, 489 N.W.2d 857 (1992). Not error to admit in evidence a transcription of a tape recording which was itself in evidence. State v. Martin, 198 Neb. 811, 255 N.W.2d 844 (1977). By its terms, this section applies to proof of the contents of a recording. Chevalier v. Metropolitan Util. Dist., 24 Neb. App. 874, 900 N.W.2d 565 (2017). The best evidence rule is a rule of preference for the production of the original of a writing, recording, or photograph when the contents of the item are sought to be proved. Chevalier v. Metropolitan Util. Dist., 24 Neb. App. 874, 900 N.W.2d 565 (2017). The purpose of the best evidence rule is the prevention of fraud, inaccuracy, mistake, or mistransmission of critical facts contained in a writing, recording, or photograph when its contents are an issue in a proceeding. Chevalier v. Metropolitan Util. Dist., 24 Neb. App. 874, 900 N.W.2d 565 (2017). The best evidence rule, also known as the original document rule, states that the original writing, recording, or photograph is required to prove the content of that writing, recording, or photograph. Flodman v. Robinson, 22 Neb. App. 943, 864 N.W.2d 716 (2015).
Nearby Sections
15
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Nebraska § 27-1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ne/27-1002.