Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
This text of 807 So. 2d 733 (Munn v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Thomas A. MUNN, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Thomas A. Munn, pro se, petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Robert R. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Thomas A. Munn petitions this court for mandamus relief in the form of an order directing the circuit court to rule on a petition for writ of habeas corpus pending in that forum. In light of the circuit court's recent issuance of an order to show cause why the petition pending below should not be granted, we conclude that the granting of mandamus relief is not warranted.[1] We do, however, encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on the merits of the claim before it.
KAHN, VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Munn's request that we permit the amendment of this proceeding to undertake certiorari review of the circuit court's order to show cause is denied based on our conclusion that the prerequisites for certiorari review are not present. See generally, Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
807 So. 2d 733, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1353, 2002 WL 205825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munn-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2002.