Clarence Perkins Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2019·No. 19-1107·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D19-1107

CLARENCE PERKINS JR., Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

June 28, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla.

Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Clarence Perkins Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clarence Perkins Jr. v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Clarence Perkins Jr. v. State of Florida (Clarence Perkins Jr. v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)