Eddie James Moultrie v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 2018·No. 17-2575·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-2575 _____________________________

EDDIE JAMES MOULTRIE,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus – Original Jurisdiction.

February 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

RAY, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Eddie James Moultrie, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eddie James Moultrie v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Eddie James Moultrie v. State of Florida (Eddie James Moultrie v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)