Eddie James Moultrie v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Eddie James Moultrie v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 19, 2018

Docket17-2575

StatusPublished

This text of Eddie James Moultrie v. State of Florida (Eddie James Moultrie v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eddie James Moultrie v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-2575 _____________________________

EDDIE JAMES MOULTRIE,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus – Original Jurisdiction.

February 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

RAY, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Eddie James Moultrie, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI