Cupp v. State of Florida
This text of Cupp v. State of Florida (Cupp v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-3269 _____________________________
WILLIAM M. CUPP,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
March 13, 2024
PER CURIAM.
As the circuit court recently issued an order directing the State to respond, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
BILBREY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ William M. Cupp, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cupp v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cupp-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.