Moultrie v. Dixon

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 2025·No. 1D2025-0546·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2025-0546 _____________________________

EDDIE JAMES MOULTRIE,

Petitioner,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceedings.

November 19, 2025

PER CURIAM.

As the circuit court directed a response to the petition pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). LEWIS, RAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Eddie James Moultrie, pro se, Petitioner.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee; and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moultrie v. Dixon, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Moultrie v. Dixon (Moultrie v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)