Moultrie v. Dixon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moultrie v. Dixon

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 2025

Docket1D2025-0546

StatusPublished

This text of Moultrie v. Dixon (Moultrie v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moultrie v. Dixon, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2025-0546 _____________________________

EDDIE JAMES MOULTRIE,

Petitioner,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceedings.

November 19, 2025

PER CURIAM.

As the circuit court directed a response to the petition pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). LEWIS, RAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Eddie James Moultrie, pro se, Petitioner.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee; and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI