Littleton v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-3083 _____________________________
ZACHARY ANTWANN LITTLETON,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
August 21, 2024
PER CURIAM.
As the circuit court directed a response to the motion pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
ROBERTS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Zachary Antwann Littleton, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Littleton v. State of Florida (Littleton v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.