Flowers v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-2258 _____________________________
NICHOLAS FLOWERS,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
April 2, 2025
PER CURIAM.
As the circuit court directed a response to the motions pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
LEWIS, ROBERTS, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Nicholas Flowers, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Flowers v. State of Florida (Flowers v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.