Stephens v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 2025·No. 1D2024-1390·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2024-1390

ROY ALLEN STEPHENS, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,

Respondents.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

July 23, 2025

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

ROBERTS, KELSEY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Roy Allen Stephens, pro se, Petitioner.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Stephens v. State of Florida (Stephens v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)