Maurice Noble v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 6, 2015·No. 14-3980·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

MAURICE NOBLE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-3980

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed January 7, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Maurice Noble, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA

2002) (holding that where the trial court has recently taken action on a pending

pleading, mandamus relief was not warranted).

BENTON, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maurice Noble v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Maurice Noble v. State of Florida (Maurice Noble v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)