Maurice Noble v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maurice Noble v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 6, 2015

Docket14-3980

StatusPublished

This text of Maurice Noble v. State of Florida (Maurice Noble v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maurice Noble v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

MAURICE NOBLE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-3980

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed January 7, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Maurice Noble, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA

2002) (holding that where the trial court has recently taken action on a pending

pleading, mandamus relief was not warranted).

BENTON, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI