Crawford v. COMMERCIAL UNION MIDWEST INS. COM.
572 S.E.2d 781, 356 N.C. 609, 2002 N.C. LEXIS 1254
Opinion
Justice BUTTERFIELD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court were equally divided, with three members voting to affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and three members voting to reverse. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Reese v. Barbee, 350 N.C. 60, 510 S.E.2d 374 (1999); Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crawford v. COMMERCIAL UNION MIDWEST INS. COM., 572 S.E.2d 781, 356 N.C. 609, 2002 N.C. LEXIS 1254 (N.C. 2002).
572 S.E.2d 781 (Crawford v. COMMERCIAL UNION MIDWEST INS. COM.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weaver v. Sheppa
661 S.E.2d 733 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)
Williams v. Vonderau
653 S.E.2d 144 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
Wornstaff v. Wornstaff
641 S.E.2d 301 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
Formyduval v. Britt
639 S.E.2d 443 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
State v. Everett
639 S.E.2d 442 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
State v. Bauberger
637 S.E.2d 536 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Harrison
627 S.E.2d 461 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Renfro
627 S.E.2d 463 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)
Barham v. Hawk
625 S.E.2d 778 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)
Currituck Associates-Residential Partnership v. Hollowell
360 N.C. 160 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Foster
604 S.E.2d 913 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2004)
BEATENHEAD v. Lincoln County
604 S.E.2d 914 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Alston
602 S.E.2d 674 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Holden
602 S.E.2d 360 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2004)