State v. Everett

639 S.E.2d 442, 361 N.C. 217, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 36
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 26, 2007·No. No. 350A06·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice HUDSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Harrison, 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Everett, 639 S.E.2d 442, 361 N.C. 217, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 36 (N.C. 2007).

639 S.E.2d 442 (State v. Everett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Capps
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
State v. McGrady
753 S.E.2d 361 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)