Reese v. Barbee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Reese v. Barbee

510 S.E.2d 374, 350 N.C. 60, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 1

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 5, 1999

Docket269PA98

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 510 S.E.2d 374 (Reese v. Barbee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reese v. Barbee, 510 S.E.2d 374, 350 N.C. 60, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 1 (N.C. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Chief Justice Mitchell and Associate Justices Parker and Wainwright voted to affirm and Associate Justices Frye, Lake and Orr voted to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993); Kempson v. N.C. Dep’t of Human Resources, 328 N.C. 722, 403 S.E.2d 279 (1991).

AFFIRMED.

Associate Justice Martin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Chief Justice Mitchell and Associate Justices Parker and Wainwright voted to affirm and Associate Justices Frye, Lake and Orr voted to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993); Kempson v. N.C. Dep’t of Human Resources, 328 N.C. 722, 403 S.E.2d 279 (1991).

AFFIRMED.

Associate Justice Martin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

510 S.E.2d 374, 350 N.C. 60, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-barbee-nc-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack