Barham v. Hawk
625 S.E.2d 778, 360 N.C. 358, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 18
Opinion
Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barham v. Hawk, 625 S.E.2d 778, 360 N.C. 358, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 18 (N.C. 2006).
625 S.E.2d 778 (Barham v. Hawk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Katy v. Capriola
742 S.E.2d 247 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
Day v. Brant
721 S.E.2d 238 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2012)
Rodriguez-Carias v. Nelson's Auto Salvage & Towing Service
677 S.E.2d 453 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)
Williams v. Kane
676 S.E.2d 670 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Heatherly v. State
678 S.E.2d 656 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)
Hall v. TOREROS II, INC.
678 S.E.2d 656 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)
State v. Caple
657 S.E.2d 354 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)
Vogler v. Branch Erections Co.
653 S.E.2d 142 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
Vogler v. Branch Erections Company, Inc.
653 S.E.2d 142 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
Masood v. Erwin Oil Co.
650 S.E.2d 595 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
Ripellino v. North Carolina School Boards Ass'n
639 S.E.2d 441 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
Ripellino v. Nc School Boards Ass'n
639 S.E.2d 441 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)