Ripellino v. Nc School Boards Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Ripellino v. Nc School Boards Ass'n

639 S.E.2d 441

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 26, 2007

DocketNo. 180A06.

StatusPublished

This text of 639 S.E.2d 441 (Ripellino v. Nc School Boards Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ripellino v. Nc School Boards Ass'n, 639 S.E.2d 441 (N.C. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, the members of the Court are equally divided. Therefore, those portions of the Court of Appeals opinion are affirmed without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006). The Court, however, unanimously concludes that the Court of Appeals erred in remanding the case to the trial court for entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs on their non-constitutional claims. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals and remand to that Court for remand to the trial court for further proceedings on plaintiffs' non-constitutional claims. As to additional issues, discretionary review was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, the members of the Court are equally divided. Therefore, those portions of the Court of Appeals opinion are affirmed without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006). The Court, however, unanimously concludes that the Court of Appeals erred in remanding the case to the trial court for entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs on their non-constitutional claims. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals and remand to that Court for remand to the trial court for further proceedings on plaintiffs' non-constitutional claims. As to additional issues, discretionary review was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

639 S.E.2d 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ripellino-v-nc-school-boards-assn-nc-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack