State v. Caple

657 S.E.2d 354, 362 N.C. 232, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 150
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 7, 2008·No. No. 437A05-2·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice HUDSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

[233]*233[[Image here]]

[234]*234[[Image here]]

[235]*235[[Image here]]

[236]*236[[Image here]]

[237]*237[[Image here]]

[238]*238[[Image here]]

[239]*239[[Image here]]

[240]*240[[Image here]]

[241]*241[[Image here]]

[242]*242[[Image here]]

[243]*243[[Image here]]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Caple, 657 S.E.2d 354, 362 N.C. 232, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 150 (N.C. 2008).

657 S.E.2d 354 (State v. Caple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barham v. Hawk
625 S.E.2d 778 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)