Heatherly v. State
678 S.E.2d 656, 363 N.C. 115, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 229
Opinion
Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, the remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heatherly v. State, 678 S.E.2d 656, 363 N.C. 115, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 229 (N.C. 2009).
678 S.E.2d 656 (Heatherly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Swaps, LLC v. Asl Props., Inc.
791 S.E.2d 711 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)