Masood v. Erwin Oil Co.

650 S.E.2d 595, 361 N.C. 579, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 1004
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 12, 2007·No. 94A07·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, the members of the Court are equally divided. Therefore, the Court of Appeals opinion is left undisturbed without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

*580 AFFIRMED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Masood v. Erwin Oil Co., 650 S.E.2d 595, 361 N.C. 579, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 1004 (N.C. 2007).

650 S.E.2d 595 (Masood v. Erwin Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Putman v. Alexander
670 S.E.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Kenion v. MAPLE VIEW FARM, INC.
664 S.E.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)