Masood v. Erwin Oil Co.

650 S.E.2d 595
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Masood v. Erwin Oil Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 361 N.C. 579
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 12, 2007·No. No. 94A07.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, the members of the Court are equally divided. Therefore, the Court of Appeals opinion is left undisturbed without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Masood v. Erwin Oil Co., 650 S.E.2d 595 (N.C. 2007).

650 S.E.2d 595 (Masood v. Erwin Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barham v. Hawk
625 S.E.2d 778 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)