Hall v. TOREROS II, INC.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Hall v. TOREROS II, INC.

678 S.E.2d 656, 363 N.C. 114, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 235

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 20, 2009·No. 187PA06·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice MARTIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Justice MARTIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

Hall v. TOREROS II, INC., 678 S.E.2d 656, 363 N.C. 114, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 235 (N.C. 2009).

Pincite

678 S.E.2d 656 (Hall v. TOREROS II, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related