Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary

709 S.E.2d 597, 365 N.C. 210
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 2011
Docket390PA10
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 709 S.E.2d 597 (Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 709 S.E.2d 597, 365 N.C. 210 (N.C. 2011).

Opinion

709 S.E.2d 597 (2011)

AMWARD HOMES, INC., Ange Construction Company, Bluepoint Homes, Inc., Homescape Building Company, Impact Design-Build, Inc., John Leggett and Company, Poythress Construction Company, Inc., Poythress Homes, Inc., Wardson Construction, Inc., WHG, Inc., d/b/a Timberline Builders, and Zeigler & Company
v.
TOWN OF CARY, a body politic and corporate
Tradition at Stonewater I, LP, Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
Town of Cary, a body politic and corporate, Defendant to Claim of Plaintiff-Intervenor.

No. 390PA10.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 15, 2011.

Michael B. Brough, for Town of Cary.

William J. Brian, Jr., Morrisville, for Amward Homes, Inc., et al.

John C. Cooke, Raleigh, for Town of Cary.

Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Raleigh, for Town of Cary.

Michael T. Henry, Raleigh, for Town of Cary.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of September 2010 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of June 2011."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

JACKSON, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lewis
709 S.E.2d 597 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 S.E.2d 597, 365 N.C. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amward-homes-inc-v-town-of-cary-nc-2011.