State v. Huss

749 S.E.2d 279, 367 N.C. 162, 2013 WL 5973923, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1160
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 8, 2013·No. 499PA12·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); State v. Pastuer, 367 N.C. 287, 715 S.E.2d 850 (2011).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Huss, 749 S.E.2d 279, 367 N.C. 162, 2013 WL 5973923, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1160 (N.C. 2013).

749 S.E.2d 279 (State v. Huss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Aaron Shell
789 F.3d 335 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)