State v. Franklin
752 S.E.2d 143, 367 N.C. 183, 2013 WL 6834654, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1367
Opinion
Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Franklin, 752 S.E.2d 143, 367 N.C. 183, 2013 WL 6834654, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1367 (N.C. 2013).
752 S.E.2d 143 (State v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Killette
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019
State v. Ellis
829 S.E.2d 912 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
State v. Curtis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2015