Samost v. Duke University

751 S.E.2d 611, 367 N.C. 185, 2013 WL 6732887, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1365
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 20, 2013·No. 218A13·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); State v. Pastuer, 367 N.C. 287, 715 S.E.2d 850 (2011).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samost v. Duke University, 751 S.E.2d 611, 367 N.C. 185, 2013 WL 6732887, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 1365 (N.C. 2013).

751 S.E.2d 611 (Samost v. Duke University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barefoot v. Rule
828 S.E.2d 685 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
Stern v. Stern
826 S.E.2d 490 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)