Griffin v. Ball

758 S.E.2d 398, 367 N.C. 385, 2014 WL 2618303, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 406
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 12, 2014
Docket559PA11-2
StatusPublished

This text of 758 S.E.2d 398 (Griffin v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffin v. Ball, 758 S.E.2d 398, 367 N.C. 385, 2014 WL 2618303, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 406 (N.C. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the order of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the order of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldston v. State
700 S.E.2d 223 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)
Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary
716 S.E.2d 849 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2011)
Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary
716 S.E.2d 849 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
758 S.E.2d 398, 367 N.C. 385, 2014 WL 2618303, 2014 N.C. LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffin-v-ball-nc-2014.