Currituck Associates-Residential Partnership v. Hollowell
360 N.C. 160
Opinion
Justice MARTIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. .Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Currituck Associates-Residential Partnership v. Hollowell, 360 N.C. 160 (N.C. 2005).
360 N.C. 160 (Currituck Associates-Residential Partnership v. Hollowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. Byrd
572 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)
Crawford v. COMMERCIAL UNION MIDWEST INS. COM.
572 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)