Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Currituck Associates-Residential Partnership v. Hollowell

Currituck Associates-Residential Partnership v. Hollowell

622 S.E.2d 493, 360 N.C. 160, 2005 N.C. LEXIS 1316
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 16, 2005
DocketNo. 528A04.
StatusPublished

This text of 622 S.E.2d 493 (Currituck Associates-Residential Partnership v. Hollowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Currituck Associates-Residential Partnership v. Hollowell, 622 S.E.2d 493, 360 N.C. 160, 2005 N.C. LEXIS 1316 (N.C. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice MARTIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union *494Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. Byrd
572 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)
Crawford v. COMMERCIAL UNION MIDWEST INS. COM.
572 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 S.E.2d 493, 360 N.C. 160, 2005 N.C. LEXIS 1316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/currituck-associates-residential-partnership-v-hollowell-nc-2005.