State v. Bauberger

637 S.E.2d 536, 361 N.C. 105, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 1285
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 2006·No. 172A06·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice WAINWRIGHT took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Harrison, 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., *106 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bauberger, 637 S.E.2d 536, 361 N.C. 105, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 1285 (N.C. 2006).

637 S.E.2d 536 (State v. Bauberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bauberger v. Haynes
632 F.3d 100 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
State v. Patino
699 S.E.2d 678 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Bauberger v. Haynes
702 F. Supp. 2d 588 (M.D. North Carolina, 2010)
State v. Moore
656 S.E.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)