Wornstaff v. Wornstaff
641 S.E.2d 301, 361 N.C. 230, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 216
Opinion
[231]*231Justice HUDSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Harrison, 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wornstaff v. Wornstaff, 641 S.E.2d 301, 361 N.C. 230, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 216 (N.C. 2007).
641 S.E.2d 301 (Wornstaff v. Wornstaff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. Martin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019
State v. KARGES
664 S.E.2d 78 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
Ramsey v. Harman
661 S.E.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)