Wornstaff v. Wornstaff

641 S.E.2d 301
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wornstaff v. Wornstaff. Read the opinion of the Court — 361 N.C. 230
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 9, 2007·No. No. 558A06.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice HUDSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Harrison, 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wornstaff v. Wornstaff, 641 S.E.2d 301 (N.C. 2007).

641 S.E.2d 301 (Wornstaff v. Wornstaff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Harrison
627 S.E.2d 461 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)
Crawford v. COMMERCIAL UNION MIDWEST INS. COM.
572 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)