Wornstaff v. Wornstaff
641 S.E.2d 301
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wornstaff v. Wornstaff. Read the opinion of the Court — 361 N.C. 230 →
Opinion
Justice HUDSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Harrison,
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wornstaff v. Wornstaff, 641 S.E.2d 301 (N.C. 2007).
641 S.E.2d 301 (Wornstaff v. Wornstaff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Harrison
627 S.E.2d 461 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2006)
Crawford v. COMMERCIAL UNION MIDWEST INS. COM.
572 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2002)