Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Holden

State v. Holden

602 S.E.2d 360, 359 N.C. 60, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 1121
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 7, 2004·No. 574PA03·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. 1 Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

1

. At the time this case was heard and decided, the Court consisted of only six members, due to the retirement of Associate Justice Orr on 31 July 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Holden, 602 S.E.2d 360, 359 N.C. 60, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 1121 (N.C. 2004).

602 S.E.2d 360 (State v. Holden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lalinde
750 S.E.2d 868 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
State v. Braxton
643 S.E.2d 637 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
State v. Spencer
630 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
State v. Massey
621 S.E.2d 633 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Bates
616 S.E.2d 280 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Brewer
615 S.E.2d 360 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Lawrence
612 S.E.2d 678 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)