State v. Renfro
627 S.E.2d 463, 360 N.C. 395, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 33
Opinion
Justice BRADY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Renfro, 627 S.E.2d 463, 360 N.C. 395, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 33 (N.C. 2006).
627 S.E.2d 463 (State v. Renfro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Schiro
723 S.E.2d 134 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2012)
State v. Slade
671 S.E.2d 71 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. Little
652 S.E.2d 71 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)