Cox v. Rogers
1911 OK 461, 119 P. 205, 30 Okla. 296, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 457
Opinion
Opinion by
The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court on November 12, 1909. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the case. The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosetion. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 Pac. 205; Bender v. Bender et al., infra, 119 Pac. 205.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cox v. Rogers, 1911 OK 461, 119 P. 205, 30 Okla. 296, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 457 (Okla. 1911).
1911 OK 461 (Cox v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simmer v. Gray
1923 OK 737 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Hill v. Riddle
1912 OK 726 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Hukill v. Tharp
1912 OK 728 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Ledbetter v. Kimsey
1912 OK 639 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin
1912 OK 624 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber
1912 OK 648 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Snow v. Frye
1912 OK 651 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Rice v. Jones
1912 OK 404 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Bender v. Bender
1911 OK 457 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
McClelland v. Witherall
1911 OK 471 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Farmers' & Bankers' Warehouse Ass'n v. Burt
120 P. 296 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)