Rice v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rice v. Jones

1912 OK 404, 124 P. 67, 32 Okla. 734, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 325

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 14, 1912·No. 1539·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court March 9, 1910. Plaintiffs *735 in error have failed to file brief in the case. Petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 2 7 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Bender v. Bender, 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court March 9, 1910. Plaintiffs *735 in error have failed to file brief in the case. Petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 2 7 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Bender v. Bender, 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Rice v. Jones, 1912 OK 404, 124 P. 67, 32 Okla. 734, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 325 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK 404 (Rice v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related