Rice v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rice v. Jones

1912 OK 404, 124 P. 67, 32 Okla. 734, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 325

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 14, 1912

Docket1539

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1912 OK 404 (Rice v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rice v. Jones, 1912 OK 404, 124 P. 67, 32 Okla. 734, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 325 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court March 9, 1910. Plaintiffs *735 in error have failed to file brief in the case. Petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 2 7 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Bender v. Bender, 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court March 9, 1910. Plaintiffs *735 in error have failed to file brief in the case. Petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 2 7 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Bender v. Bender, 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 404, 124 P. 67, 32 Okla. 734, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-jones-okla-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack