Bender v. Bender

1911 OK 457, 119 P. 205, 30 Okla. 288, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 455
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 18, 1911·No. 1189·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court November 4, 1909. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by.rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). The petition in error should therefore be dismissed, for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, infra, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bender v. Bender, 1911 OK 457, 119 P. 205, 30 Okla. 288, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 455 (Okla. 1911).

1911 OK 457 (Bender v. Bender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. Riddle
1912 OK 726 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Ledbetter v. Kimsey
1912 OK 639 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin
1912 OK 624 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber
1912 OK 648 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Snow v. Frye
1912 OK 651 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Rice v. Jones
1912 OK 404 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Cox v. Rogers
1911 OK 461 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
McClelland v. Witherall
1911 OK 471 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Farmers' & Bankers' Warehouse Ass'n v. Burt
120 P. 296 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)