Snow v. Frye
This text of 1912 OK 651 (Snow v. Frye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This appeal was filed January 3, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief, nor has any excuse been offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissd for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.
By the Court: It is so ordered. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1912 OK 651, 127 P. 422, 34 Okla. 826, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/snow-v-frye-okla-1912.