Miller v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Miller v. Williams

1913 OK 443, 132 P. 1191, 37 Okla. 701, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 269

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 20, 1913·No. 2712·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

EOBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court June 8, 1911. Neither party has filed a brief, nor is there any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed, for want of prosecution, *702 under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi); Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 Pac. 216; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 Pac. 1133; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 Pac. 422; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 Pac. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

EOBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court June 8, 1911. Neither party has filed a brief, nor is there any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed, for want of prosecution, *702 under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi); Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 Pac. 216; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 Pac. 1133; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 Pac. 422; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 Pac. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Miller v. Williams, 1913 OK 443, 132 P. 1191, 37 Okla. 701, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 269 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

1913 OK 443 (Miller v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related