First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin

1912 OK 624, 127 P. 260, 34 Okla. 825, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 496

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 15, 1912·No. 2206·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court December 22, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief, nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therfore, be dismissd for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court December 22, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief, nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therfore, be dismissd for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin, 1912 OK 624, 127 P. 260, 34 Okla. 825, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 496 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK 624 (First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related