Newcomer v. Freeman

1913 OK 511, 134 P. 1199, 39 Okla. 132, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 469
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided August 6, 1913·No. 2846·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court June 26, 1911. Neither party has filed a brief, nor is there any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed, for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 Pac. 216; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 Pac. 1133; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 Pac. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 Pac. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newcomer v. Freeman, 1913 OK 511, 134 P. 1199, 39 Okla. 132, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 469 (Okla. 1913).

1913 OK 511 (Newcomer v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Murray
1912 OK 554 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin
1912 OK 624 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Streeter v. McCoy
1912 OK 551 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Streeter v. Huene
126 P. 216 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber
1912 OK 648 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson
1912 OK 643 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Snow v. Frye
1912 OK 651 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)