Wallingford v. Wood

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Wallingford v. Wood

1914 OK 101, 139 P. 252, 41 Okla. 572, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 183

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 28, 1914·No. 3474·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal was filed in this court January 2, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have the)'- offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want, of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 *573 Okla. 490, 136 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 135 Pac. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 137 Pac. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 836, 137 Pac. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal was filed in this court January 2, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have the)'- offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want, of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 *573 Okla. 490, 136 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 135 Pac. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 137 Pac. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 836, 137 Pac. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Wallingford v. Wood, 1914 OK 101, 139 P. 252, 41 Okla. 572, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 183 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

1914 OK 101 (Wallingford v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related