Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Cline

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Cline

1914 OK 211, 140 P. 1147, 42 Okla. 204, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 332

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 12, 1914·No. 3527·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

TPIACKER, C.

On January 19, 1912, the case-made was filed in this court; on January 13, 1914, this case was due to be taken on submission; but the plaintiff in error has wholly failed to file briefs as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), and has thus abandoned the appeal. See Wallingford v. Wood et al., 41 Okla. 572, 139 Pac. 252; Howard Mercantile Co. et al. v. Squires, County Judge, et al., 41 Okla. 580, 139 Pac. 253; Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry Co., 39 Okla. 141, 134 Pac. 442.

We are therefore of the opinion that the case should be treated as abandoned and dismissed. Dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

TPIACKER, C.

On January 19, 1912, the case-made was filed in this court; on January 13, 1914, this case was due to be taken on submission; but the plaintiff in error has wholly failed to file briefs as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), and has thus abandoned the appeal. See Wallingford v. Wood et al., 41 Okla. 572, 139 Pac. 252; Howard Mercantile Co. et al. v. Squires, County Judge, et al., 41 Okla. 580, 139 Pac. 253; Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry Co., 39 Okla. 141, 134 Pac. 442.

We are therefore of the opinion that the case should be treated as abandoned and dismissed. Dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Cline, 1914 OK 211, 140 P. 1147, 42 Okla. 204, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 332 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

1914 OK 211 (Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Cline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related