Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co.

1913 OK 525, 134 P. 442, 39 Okla. 141, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 472
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedAugust 12, 1913
Docket2860
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1913 OK 525 (Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co., 1913 OK 525, 134 P. 442, 39 Okla. 141, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 472 (Okla. 1913).

Opinion

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

On July 19, 1911, the case-made was filed in this court, and on June 10, 1913, this case was due to be taken on submission; but the plaintiff in error has wholly failed to file briefs as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) and has thus abandoned the appeal. See Hill v. Riddle, 36 Okla. 122, 128 Pac. 112; Hukill v. Tharp, 36 Okla. 178, 128 Pac. 115; Ledbetter v. Kimsey, post, 128 Pac. 1086; Green v. State, ex rel. Caldwell, 36 Okla. 287, 128 Pac. 257.

We are therefore of the opinion the appeal should be treated as abandoned and dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Cline
1914 OK 211 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Breckinridge
1914 OK 210 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1913 OK 525, 134 P. 442, 39 Okla. 141, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-o-w-ry-co-v-kansas-city-m-o-ry-co-okla-1913.