Hukill v. Tharp

1912 OK 728, 128 P. 113, 36 Okla. 178, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 836

Opinion

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court January 9, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief; nor have they asked for an extension of time in which to prepare and file brief. It will therefore be considered that the appeal has been abandoned; and the petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Rice et al. v. Jones et al., 32 Okla. 734, 124 Pac. 67; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath, 32 Okla. 857, 124 Pac. 59.

By the Court: It is so ordered.