Ledbetter v. Kimsey

1912 OK 639, 128 P. 1086, 39 Okla. 282, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 497
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 15, 1912
Docket2172
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1912 OK 639 (Ledbetter v. Kimsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ledbetter v. Kimsey, 1912 OK 639, 128 P. 1086, 39 Okla. 282, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 497 (Okla. 1912).

Opinion

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court December 8, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief; nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co.
1913 OK 525 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1912 OK 639, 128 P. 1086, 39 Okla. 282, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledbetter-v-kimsey-okla-1912.