Ledbetter v. Kimsey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Ledbetter v. Kimsey

1912 OK 639, 128 P. 1086, 39 Okla. 282, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 497

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 15, 1912·No. 2172·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court December 8, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief; nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court December 8, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief; nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Ledbetter v. Kimsey, 1912 OK 639, 128 P. 1086, 39 Okla. 282, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 497 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK 639 (Ledbetter v. Kimsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related