Farmers' & Bankers' Warehouse Ass'n v. Burt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Farmers' & Bankers' Warehouse Ass'n v. Burt

120 P. 296, 30 Okla. 326

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 18, 1911·No. No. 1235·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court November 24, 1909, and no brief has been filed by the plaintiffs in error. The peti[327] tion in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200, and cases there cited; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers et al., infra, 119 Pac. 205; Bender v. Bender, infra, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court November 24, 1909, and no brief has been filed by the plaintiffs in error. The peti[327] tion in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200, and cases there cited; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers et al., infra, 119 Pac. 205; Bender v. Bender, infra, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Farmers' & Bankers' Warehouse Ass'n v. Burt, 120 P. 296, 30 Okla. 326 (Okla. 1911).

Pincite

120 P. 296 (Farmers' & Bankers' Warehouse Ass'n v. Burt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related