Simmer v. Gray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Simmer v. Gray

1923 OK 737, 218 P. 1057, 92 Okla. 235, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 848

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 2, 1923

Docket11966

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK 737 (Simmer v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Simmer v. Gray, 1923 OK 737, 218 P. 1057, 92 Okla. 235, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 848 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This cause comes on to be heard upon motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal for the reason that on April 18, 1923, this court ordered plaintiffs in error to file their brief on or before July 1, 1923; and that said plaintiffs in error have failed and neglected to file said brief, or to serve copy thereof as required by Rule 7 of this court.

An examination of the record shows that the plaintiffs in error are in default in failing to file briefs, although the time for so doing has long since expired.

The motion to dismiss must be sustained. Bank of Taft v. Thompson, 29 Okla. 683, 119 Pac. 124; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: - It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI